This article was originally published in Danish on November 24, 2021.
Once again, we must unfortunately deal with this sad topic – sad not so much because of the disease itself, but because the way it is being handled reveals a hopeless form of government that is far more dangerous than the Chinese-American virus in question, and a completely state-controlled and totally uncritical press that does not allow experts who can see the madness of the policies pursued to have their say. These experts are referred to the anti-social media, where it is easy to dismiss them and label them as conspiracy theorists.
However, let us once again state that the chances of surviving this virus are 99.6% or thereabouts. To call this disease socially critical is simply a criminal deception—a criminal abuse of language and human intelligence, which is unfortunately poorly represented in the government, parliament, state administration, and various agencies. Had it been Ebola—with a mortality rate of 50%—the situation would, of course, have been different.
A year ago, we were told that we just needed to get vaccinated – then everything would be fine again. Today, a year later, the infection rates are fully on par with last year’s – despite a vaccination rate of around 75%, which should have been more than enough to cause the virus to die out. The sensible response to this would be to suspend vaccinations, whose value seems negligible. But no, the response is: more vaccinations and a third shot – a fourth, a fifth, etc. – once every six months. In short, they are trying to convince the unvaccinated that vaccines are effective, while at the same time convincing the vaccinated that vaccines are not effective, so that they must be revaccinated ad infinitum. In a reasonably intelligent society, this strategy would quickly fail. However, experience from other countries clearly shows that vaccinations are useless. Ireland has the highest vaccination rate that can realistically be achieved – and yet the infection is exploding. The same can be seen in Israel. Gibraltar has a vaccination rate of 100% – it is hard to imagine a higher rate – and yet Christmas has already been canceled there. These vaccines are simply of extremely dubious quality; they are a waste of money – at best, because we don’t really know anything about them. What damage will they cause us in the long term? Do they actually mean that we are more susceptible to infection? How do they affect fertility? We know nothing about them because they have been rushed through without following the normal procedures for developing medicines, which require animal testing and lengthy trials with volunteer test subjects. Or is it just good old snake oil?
It is not surprising that many people believe politicians have considerations other than public health, and I would certainly not be surprised if large sums of money were finding their way into their pockets from the pharmaceutical industry, which has really cashed in on this situation. These profits should, of course, be confiscated, but significantly, this will not happen.
Large sections of the population have been plunged into fear and hysteria over this unpleasant but fairly harmless disease – compared to so many other far more serious diseases that could have been combated much more effectively with the same monstrous sums that this psychosis has cost and will cost future generations. When hospitals are short of money – and they regularly are – they have to negotiate for months to get a few hundred million. I would guess that this madness will have cost a few hundred billion, which could have been put to good use elsewhere in the hospital system!
Add to this the attempts by the Social Democratic and Communist criminal gang to hide what has actually been going on in this case – and what the real motives were for, for example, the destruction of the Danish mink industry. This gives us an excellent insight into so-called democratic politics – and all we can say is that we don’t want any more of it. We want responsible government, led by grown men (!) with extensive professional experience and well-developed common sense – instead of a bunch of overgrown and ignorant teenage girls with their feminine sensibilities.
At the same time, we are shown how easy it is to seduce the masses. The recipe is simple: a one-sided press, a one-sided academic life, a politicized civil service, the exclusion of experts with dissenting views and analyses, and politicians’ extremely sparing use of the truth. At the same time, there is a completely unheard-of and unacceptable demonization of people who do not want this unknown liquid injected into their bodies. In other contexts, we always hear that women have control over their own bodies—even though what they control is not part of their bodies. But this obviously does not apply here, even though so-called “free abortion” costs far more human lives than COVID-19.
Jyllands-Posten reports today that people are automatically changing their behavior. The completely ridiculous and totally ineffective face mask is becoming a common part of attire, people are shunning each other as if the Black Death were in the country, people are refraining from shaking hands, etc., etc. Perhaps this is a common exercise in how to divide a population, destroy cohesion, and create mistrust between people. A divided people is, as we know, a weak people.
Mass psychosis and mass hysteria are tools used by those in power to control a population. This is nothing new, but it is rare to see such clear and obvious examples as we do today. In addition to Corona, this also concerns the climate. Children are being sent to psychologists because they believe that the earth is on the brink of destruction. Again, this is a controlled process, promoted by the state-supported media. CO2 has nothing to do with the climate; the climate has always changed and will always change. Today, it is warmer than 100 years ago, but colder than 1,000 years ago (the Viking Age). Seen in the long term, we are in a cold period. It is a sign of utter madness when ignorant politicians and prostituted scientists believe that the “right” temperature is, for example, that of 1980. There is no right temperature; glaciers are beautiful, but they have not always been there in their current form. It is not a law of nature that Greenland must be covered in ice, etc. But it is characteristic of our time that it is not prominent scientists such as Professor Johannes Krüger who are listened to, but a mentally ill 18-year-old Swedish girl with no education of any kind and no knowledge whatsoever of the climate, what affects the climate, or the development of the climate through the ages. She is invited to scientific conferences, granted an audience with the Pope (who also knows nothing about climate) and nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize, which she will probably end up receiving. Krüger, on the other hand, has been canceled.
As it gradually gets colder, because it is getting colder—we are heading toward a new ice age—politicians and “the tuna fish” aka Greta Thunberg (which in this case is more like cod) will naturally claim that it is thanks to them—even when we eventually need an ice pick to get out of our homes. This is a clown world that no author in their wildest imagination could have described better. Jules Verne would pale with envy. As it gradually gets colder, because it is getting colder—we are heading toward a new ice age—politicians and the tuna fish aka Greta Thunberg (which in this case is more like cod) will naturally claim that it is thanks to them—even when we eventually need an ice pick to get out of our homes. This is a clown world that no author in their wildest imagination could have described better. Jules Verne would pale with envy.
Do you remember the turn of the millennium? I do! At that time, a clever computer scientist had figured out that all computer systems would crash on New Year’s Eve during the transition from 1999 to 2000. Computers simply would not be able to handle it. Planes would crash, respirators would stop working, the CPR registry would collapse (a wonderful thought), etc. The hysteria was similar to what we are experiencing today in connection with the Chinese-American virus and the climate. The newspapers were full of doomsday prophecies. Self-proclaimed experts in creating panic had a field day. Airlines suspended operations on New Year’s Eve. The government and businesses spent billions and billions of kroner on “millennium-proofing” their systems – and the computer industry made a killing, warning that anyone who had not made this “investment” would lose all their data on that fateful night. What happened? Nothing. Computers jumped just as easily and elegantly from 1999 to 2000 – without any problems whatsoever. Suddenly, there was a lot of silence around “millennium security.” It was quickly forgotten. That’s how you create panic.
Meanwhile, Christmas is being canceled for the second year in a row (just wait!) – and Europe is being flooded every day by new waves of so-called “migrants” who want to replace us as a people and wipe out the European nations. That‘s what we should be talking about, but this real threat is conveniently hidden behind a veil of imaginary threats such as Corona and climate change. Yes, even Slette-Mette Mink’s fox cakes are forgotten because we have to walk around afraid of dying from a virus that only poses a danger to very, very few people, 99.99% of whom are already in the waiting room of death, perhaps without knowing it. No one can tell me that this is not a deliberate strategy. The worst thing about it all is that people are putting up with it.
Today, doctors have demanded that the guarantee of diagnosis and treatment be suspended to avoid overloading hospitals! These are obvious rights that cannot simply be disregarded at will. Doing so is guaranteed to cost lives—many more lives than the virus will cost, and we are talking about quality of life in this context. Typically, it is people in their prime who will be affected. The proposal alone is outrageous, and even more outrageous because it comes from doctors! Save all the enormous sums spent on useless tests and infection tracking and use them in hospitals instead! In the Netherlands, cancer treatment and heart surgery are already being postponed. The deaths that will result from this are insignificant – as long as people do not die from COVID-19. The “catastrophic” infection rate here at home is 69 out of 100,000 inhabitants… Very few require treatment.
As for me, I belong to the risk group – simply because of my advanced age. So Mette will take care of me – my death would obviously be a national tragedy. It’s a bit like a child hugging its kitten to death. Mette – and her equally stupid colleagues elsewhere – have not “saved” me. They have robbed me of two years of my life, during which I have been unable to do any of the things I had planned to do in my old age – and it looks set to continue indefinitely. In my age group, you don’t have that many years to give away! Life must have a certain quality to make it worth living. Mette Frederiksen and her cronies have deprived me and many others of this quality. Since there is no hell after this life, I hope that Mette Frederiksen and all the nobodies and sycophants who surround her will experience their hell here on earth – and preferably during my lifetime!
Povl H. Riis-Knudsen
Danmarks Frihedsraad 