Danmarks Frihedsraad

Should European nationalists support Israel?

This article was originally published in Danish on May 22, 2021.

In connection with the recent escalation of the conflict in the Middle East, many Danish nationalists have been falling over themselves in their eagerness to support Israel. Given the large number of Muslims currently plaguing our country, this reaction is understandable. The rationale seems to be that since we do not like Muslims and Israel is at war with Muslims, the country deserves our unconditional support. The question, however, is whether this position holds water when examined closely. Is it really in the interest of the European peoples and Europe to support Israel?

Let’s get this straight: We want all Muslims out of Denmark and Europe! We are talking about a generally hostile non-European population group whose religion/ideology requires them to spread Islam throughout the world and either convert or kill the infidels. They must leave, sooner rather than later; it cannot happen soon enough! Furthermore, it is important to emphasize that we couldn’t care less how many Muslims are killed by the Israelis. There are far too many Muslims on earth, so a little weeding out of that bed won’t hurt. But unconditional support for Israel is not a necessary consequence of the above basic views. We must not forget that there is also a significant proportion of Jews who regard the rest of us as animals that exist only to serve God’s (self-)chosen people1. So, quite frankly, we couldn’t care less about what happens in the Middle East. Let them fight it out, as long as they only kill each other and it has no consequences for us. Our first priority is to keep Denmark Danish and Europe European; everything else is secondary.

Due to the ever-increasing Islamization and concrete “cultural enrichment” that people experience in their everyday lives, it is only natural that many Danish nationalists are fixated on Muslims. You can’t blame them for that; it’s only natural to focus on what hurts the most right now. However, it would be in Denmark’s interest if people just tried to keep a cool head and look beyond the end of their own noses once in a while. Maybe that’s asking too much, but it would be good if people at least tried. As we have said before, the presence of Muslims in this country is merely a symptom of a much deeper disease. Muslims thrive on our weakness; without it, they would never have been here! And this weakness is not caused by Muslims, but by biological and cultural degeneration, which has been greatly aided by other, far more sophisticated destructive elements, including a disproportionate number of Jews2, who have continuously waged spiritual war against our cohesion, traditional values, and culture. We have been hollowed out from within, we have become a bunch of identity-less, complacent wimps with no vitality or resilience. Our fundamental problem is therefore not primarily the Muslims, but ourselves!

Another more concrete reason why Europe is flooded with Muslims is the United States’ countless wars in the Middle East. All other things being equal, these wars have been fought to secure Israel’s interests in the region. Many will instinctively exclaim that this is an “anti-Semitic conspiracy theory.” But is that really the case? Let’s take a look back in time. The idea of a “war on terror” originated at a conference 3 held in Jerusalem in 1979, where Israel’s current Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu presented his desire for the West, led by the US, to carry out preventive wars of intervention in a number of Arab countries to ensure Israel’s security. Netanyahu later elaborated on his thoughts in several books4. In this context, it should be noted that even before the founding of the State of Israel in 1948, the Zionists’ plans in the Middle East were a cause for concern for the US military leadership; “Zionist strategy will attempt to involve (the US) in a continuously growing and deepening series of actions to secure as many Jewish goals as possible”5. In 1982, former senior Israeli official Oded Yinon published the article “A Strategy for Israel in the 1980s”6, which, in short, aimed to dissolve the existing Arab states and their military capacity and transform them into ethnic and religious enclaves in constant conflict with each other, thereby ensuring Israel’s security and dominance in the region. As can be seen, this is a well-thought-out Balkanization plan based on the old motto “divide and rule”: divide your enemies and you will be stronger yourself. Another important player in this context was the strongly Jewish and Zionist7 neoconservative think tank Project for the New American Century (PNAC), which in September 2000 published a document entitled “Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategies, Forces, and Resources For a New Century.” This document set out a plan for how the US, in order to secure Israel, should intervene militarily and install new governments in a number of Arab countries, including Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Lebanon8. However, when the document was written in 2000, it was clear that it would require a “catastrophic and catalyzing event—like a new Pearl Harbor”9 to bring it to fruition. This event occurred, as we know, on September 11, 2001, and since then the US has been busy in the Middle East. If anyone still had any doubts about the US’s motivation, then-US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton spelled it out in an email in 2012, writing that “the best way to help Israel is to use military force” to overthrow the government in Syria10. America’s “war on terror” is in fact a war for Israel, and it is not unreasonable to assume that it will continue until all the Arab states designated by the Zionists lie in ruins.

No one can blame the Jews and Israel for wanting to secure their own interests; it is both rational and good – for them. However, it would be desirable if they fought their own wars and kept the rest of us out of it! The price is simply too high! Since the US launched its “war on terror,” over 10,000 Americans have died11, and it has cost no less than $5.6 trillion12, which successive US administrations have borrowed13, meaning that the country will be deeply in debt and dependent on those from whom they have borrowed the money for the foreseeable future. Added to this is a further increase in the number of culturally enriching refugees from the Middle East. The only thing the US has really gained from its “war on terror” is debt, corpses, and refugees! This is the result of supporting Israel.

The same applies in relation to Europe and Denmark. These wars, which are demonstrably wars for Israel, have brought us nothing but expenses, dead and maimed Danes, and a seemingly endless stream of refugees that our “international obligations,” which were not invented by Muslims, force us to accept. That is what we have gained from “supporting Israel”! It should therefore be crystal clear even to the blind and deaf that support for Israel is support for the downfall of Europe and Denmark.

Povl H. Riis-Knudsen

Translated with the help of AI

Notes

  1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ck5LPh1ORVA ↩︎
  2. The Culture Of Critique ↩︎
  3. Benjamin Netanyahu (ed.), International Terrorism: Challenge and Response: Proceedings of the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism, Jerusalem 1979 (Transaction Books, 1981). ↩︎
  4. Benjamin Netanyahu, Terrorism: How the West Can Win (Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 1986) & Benjamin Netanyahu, Fighting Terrorism: How Democracies can Defeat the International Terrorist Network (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2001 edition). ↩︎
  5. https://foreignpolicy.com/2010/04/02/petraeus-wasnt-the-first ↩︎
  6. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yinon_Plan ↩︎
  7. https://archive.org/details/UnderstandingJewishInfluence_355/mode/2up ↩︎
  8. “Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategies, Forces, and Resources For a New Century” ↩︎
  9. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century ↩︎
  10. https://bollyn.com/the-fraudulent-war-on-terror/#article_16228 ↩︎
  11. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_on_terror#Casualties ↩︎
  12. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_on_terror#Costs ↩︎
  13. https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/files/cow/imce/papers/2020/Peltier%202020%20-%20The%20Cost%20of%20Debt-financed%20War.pdf ↩︎

Skriv en kommentar