This article was originally published in Danish on January 8, 2021.

---

Over the past four years, there has been no shortage of calls to write about the Trump phenomenon, but I believe now is the right time to do so. Trump is certainly not like most people. Perhaps he is sometimes a little too impulsive and quick to pull the trigger, but he is definitely the best president the US has had since Ronald Reagan. He put America first, he limited the damage caused by Obama’s so-called healthcare reform, he ensured a strong economy that was only disrupted by the Chinese virus, and he pulled the US out of hopeless military ventures that successive presidents had entangled the country in. It is true that he was also Israel’s president, and in that capacity he scored many political victories with the aim of bringing the Arab states closer to Israel. This was, of course, at the expense of the Palestinians, but sympathy for them may now be at a low ebb among the hard-pressed populations of the West.

It is typical that the Danes have distanced themselves from Donald Trump from day one – and they have taken it for granted that everyone else does the same. Right after his election victory, I went through security at Kastrup Airport with my folder from the White House. This prompted a barrage of anti-Trump comments, which people naturally assumed I would share. Danes generally believe they know everything about the US, but in reality they know nothing. They read in the media and hear on television only what incompetent journalists write after CNN, which in this country is presented as the only American media outlet that exists. That is not the case! In the summer leading up to the 2016 election, I drove a few thousand kilometers through Trump’s America, and naturally I had the car radio tuned to CNN. All day long, it broadcast short, isolated clips of Trump’s speeches mixed with hateful comments from the Clinton network reporters.

They gave the impression of a man who was slightly deranged and whose statements did not seem to make much sense. Finally, I switched to Fox News. Here, Trump’s speeches were broadcast in their entirety, and lo and behold, it was a completely different story.

Now the man seemed extremely coherent and sensible. That was the final break between CNN and me! And it was the beginning of a reassessment of Trump, whom I had already heard on CNN leading up to the 2012 election, when he was considering running, and when I was not impressed by him either.

When the so-called Danish state-funded media constantly talk about Trump’s “undocumented” claims of election fraud, this slips unhindered down the Danish people’s throats as something self-evident. The US is a “democratic” society. There is no election fraud there – that only happens in Belarus, Russia, and other places we know nothing about – and where no election fraud has ever been documented. It’s just something people claim.

Danes perceive the US as a country much like Denmark – only much better. And they believe that elections are conducted in the same way as in Denmark, which is not entirely the case. The United States is not one country – it consists of 50 states (+ a number of territories, etc.) each with their own laws – including their own electoral systems. The United States is a country without a national register and without actual personal identification numbers. If you want to vote in elections, you have to register as a voter, and of course you can only do that in the state where you live. The system is already flawed at this point, but of course there is a limit to how many states you can physically vote in. However, where it all went wrong was when they opened up for mail-in ballots. These are simply impossible to control, which is why the Democrats were so eager to get people to vote by mail in this election—and through the media, they created a narrative that only Democrats voted by mail. Now, voting by mail in the US is also a little different from voting by mail here. We show up at “Citizen Services” – a nasty term – or at the local library, show our ID, and cast our vote, after which we cannot vote again in the actual election. The CPR register ensures this. The only real possibility for fraud is to make ballots disappear – and people do do that – but the effect of this is usually limited. In the US, you can request to have a ballot sent to you, or it is sent to you automatically, depending on which state you live in. You fill it out – i.e., you don’t know who does it, of course – put it in an envelope, sign it, and send it by mail, with the postmark serving as proof of timely submission. The signature should, of course, match the signature you gave when you registered as a voter, but we all know how it is with signatures… Now all

possibilities for fraud are open – including the possibility of voting in several states, as long as you are registered in them. But that’s not the worst of it. Certain states also allowed voters to simply drop their ballots into boxes set up around the state. In that case, there was no date stamp, i.e., no proof that they were submitted on time. However, they still had to be folded and placed in the envelope. If everything is done honestly, the possibility of fraud is still limited, but nevertheless significant. The result, however, was that people who had not voted showed up at the polling station and were told that they had indeed voted. Someone else had done it for them. Even the dead voted. As one witty dog said: “My father voted Democrat for the first time in this election. That would never have happened if he had been alive!”

Following the allegations of irregularities, a hearing was held in a Senate committee in Georgia, one of the disputed states. Here, people testified under oath about what they had experienced on election day and during the count, which of course is done mechanically by scanning and not by hand. These voting machines are notorious for allowing extensive fraud, as votes can be transferred from one candidate to another in the blink of an eye. Republican election monitors were excluded from the counting stations or had to stand so far away that they could not see anything, and officials were sent home or transferred if they reported suspicious circumstances, such as stacks of mail-in ballots without folds (i.e., they had never been in an envelope), stacks of mail-in ballots where 99% were for Biden, which experts say is statistically impossible—and even from a military base. Bundles of ballots with virtually identical signatures. Worst of all was probably that after the counting was closed and all the inspectors had been sent home, boxes of mail-in ballots were pulled out from hiding places in the room and run through the scanners over and over again – until there were enough Biden votes. Furthermore, there have been reports of “votes” stored on random loose disks, discoveries of discarded mailbags full of votes for Trump, and much, much more. Worst of all is that they will not allow these things to be investigated. For example, they will not hand over the disputed ballots. During the hearing, an expert said that he could very quickly identify the paper, printing ink, ink, etc., if only he were allowed to. But he was not allowed to. Where there is secrecy, there is usually something to hide.

But why is no court willing to intervene in this election? Well, one must imagine what would happen if the election (perhaps only in the disputed states) were declared invalid. The entire BLM segment and all the rabble in the US would burn down the cities and turn the country upside down. And then there are the international, geopolitical considerations to take into account. The US would like to be seen as a role model and not as the third world country it has become.

The US is not a nation, and as a country it is deeply divided and fragmented. Roughly speaking, it can be divided into productive and creating America, which in terms of area constitutes by far the largest part of the country, and then parasitic America, which consists of the coastal areas on both sides with offshoots in the form of some of the larger cities in the rest of the country with their stock market speculators, government officials, consultants, actors, commentators, and welfare recipients. This division was not created by Trump; it is long-standing and has been reinforced by virtually all administrations, Democratic as well as Republican, all of which have shown a true contempt for creating America and have served only the interests of capital, immigration, and decadence. Trump was the first president in many years to represent the creating people – “the big fly-over,” as the parasites contemptuously call the land between the East Coast and the West Coast – the real America that feeds latrines like New York, Washington, Los Angeles, and San Francisco. “Drain the swamp” was Trump’s slogan, but unfortunately he did not succeed. He was thwarted in everything he did from day one. There was no 100-day grace period, as there usually is, but a constant war, both political and personal. Trump simply did not have the time or opportunity to implement his program because he was forced to deal with insignificant matters. He had to defend himself against accusations of “Russian interference” in the election – an accusation that turned out to lack any evidence, but which is still being used against Trump. Even if it had been true, so what? Every country tries to influence the internal politics of other countries if it finds it in its interest to do so. We should not forget Obama’s interference in the election campaign in England leading up to the Brexit vote. In fact, no other country has tried to influence the politics of other countries to a greater extent than the US. Then there were cases involving his personal finances, accusations against his staff, the administration’s opposition to his wall against Mexico, an impeachment trial, and much more. Defending himself simply took up too much of his time and energy. This was, of course, a deliberate strategy.

Pelosi’s people talk about the need for healing, cooperation, etc., but they themselves have contributed greatly to widening the divide over the last four years, and the only logical and sensible response to them must be war. The Democrats have started a hate campaign, not only against Trump, but against everyone who has supported him. Now they are demanding revenge. Lists of Trump supporters are being drawn up. These people must be eliminated, burned, and in any case never be able to get a job or publish a book. They must be removed from society. In this context, be sure to watch this video! So much for the Democrats’ “bipartisan spirit.” What they are serving up is contempt, hatred, and incitement to violence, even murder or, better yet, mass murder. No fewer than 74 million people voted for Trump. Contrary to what the Danish gutter press claims, it was not Trump who initiated the hateful rhetoric. Hillary Clinton already used it during the campaign leading up to the previous presidential election, when she described Trump’s supporters as “a basket of deplorables.” She was talking about the people, but the “elite” has never had much respect for the people, who have been seen at best as an obstacle to the elite exercising absolute power for their own benefit.

They are used to being able to tell the creating white population whatever they want. Perhaps we saw the other day that there is a limit – but what should have been the starting signal for a civil war remained an empty demonstration. Once again, there are conservative forces claiming that it was people from BLM who interfered in the demonstration and made it violent. Once again, nationalist forces consider it out of the question that the white population should strike back. It is depressing. I hope that is not the case. Because it is also the last call in the US. Once Nancy Pelosi’s Marxist dictatorship has been established, there will be no turning back. It will no longer be possible to elect a Republican president – let alone a Republican Congress.

As usual, Russian television provided the best commentary on the events at the Capitol. It was correctly reported that the electoral system in the US is unreliable and not worthy of a democracy, just as it was recalled that during the Maidan uprising in Kiev in 2014, the people rose up against the legally elected government. The US found this perfectly acceptable; in fact, it actively supported it. So why is it so terrible when the same thing happens in Washington?

I have often discussed Trump with my acquaintances on the extreme American right wing. Their starting point has been that Trump did not really make any difference, that he too was a “Jewish lackey” – yes, that his economic improvements and better living conditions for everyone were basically bad “for the revolutionary cause.” This is basically nonsense. Trump would make a difference. And all the talk about how beneficial it would be for the revolutionary mood if the US sank into economic ruin is nonsense, because this wing would in no way be able to take advantage of a possible revolutionary situation – indeed, if you offered them the keys to power on a silver platter, they would not be able to accept them, because they simply do not have the people and the knowledge required. These are completely unrealistic dreams in an echo chamber for at most a few hundred people who have long since lost touch with reality. That wing has played its role, if it ever had one. It will take many millions of people to reform the United States, and the reforms will not look like these circles dream of – and that is probably just as well!

How much of a difference Trump would have made will become clear in the coming years. Here is a small sample of what Nancy Pelosi is up to. And I write Nancy Pelosi, because she is the one who will rule, not the demented Biden, nor Harris, who has been nominated as vice-presidential candidate – and thus soon president – because of her race and gender. She is a mixture of pretty much everything that exists in the US, but when she needs to be sold to white voters, the color is removed from the pictures and she appears white.

1. Expanding the number of Supreme Court justices so that there is a liberal-Marxist majority. This would render Trump’s judicial appointments meaningless. It is easy to implement.
2. Admission of Puerto Rico and Washington D.C. as states of the union, which would give the Democrats four more senators, as these areas have a Democratic majority. There are other areas that could be considered. It may be necessary to change the criteria for obtaining statehood slightly, but this is also feasible.
3. Granting citizenship to more immigrants from the Third World and a general increase in immigration, especially from Latin America. This would very quickly make whites a minority.
4. Repeal of the Second Amendment to the Constitution – the one that gives Americans the right to own and bear arms. If this proves too difficult, it can be watered down through legislation and reinterpretation, which will be upheld by the new Supreme Court. This will lead to the total disarmament of the country’s white population, which traditionally accepts everything. The others will probably keep their weapons.
5. Tightening of the laws against “hate speech” so that they cover virtually everything that conflicts with the interests of the Democratic Party. This would mean the de facto abolition of freedom of expression, similar to what we know from the rubber clause 266b in the Danish criminal code, a ban not only on the swastika flag, but also on the Confederate flag and slogans such as “It’s Okay to Be White!” or “White Lives Matter!” “Black Lives Matter” will of course not be included – it is, after all, an expression of love. Just like the Democrats’ own “hate speech” about revenge on Trump’s supporters and their annihilation. That is also love.
6. Enormous social and health care costs based on the Scandinavian model, which will have to be paid for by the country’s productive population, i.e. mainly white people, whose incomes are very easy to tax.
7. A “climate policy” that will impoverish the country and relocate all production to China.
8. More military adventures in distant parts of the world. Increased confrontation with Russia. Increased armament for the benefit of big capital.

There would be very good reason for the white population and Trump’s other supporters to start the civil war now. If they wait, they will not have the opportunity to do so, and they will end up like the whites in South Africa and Zimbabwe. After four years of Pelosi’s Marxist dictatorship, a Republican president will never be elected again. The US will be transformed into a third world “shit hole.”

The interesting thing about Trump is not so much the person, but the Trump phenomenon, which could rally so many people to resist the self-appointed elite in Washington’s cesspool. This gives us a glimmer of hope for the future. As for Trump the person, suffice it to say that someone who is so intensely hated by the ruling class cannot be such a bad person after all. Tell me who hates you, and I’ll tell you who you are!

Povl H. Riis-Knudsen

Translated with the help of AI