This article was originally published in Danish on November 25, 2020.

---

It is understandable to some extent that there is a certain degree of resignation and doubt among the nationalist wing today as to whether the Danish people can survive the Armageddon that our traitorous politicians have brought upon us – and not least a justified doubt as to whether the Danish people deserve to survive at all. When you read the newspapers (I deliberately do not watch television) and are confronted with statements from our completely brainless politicians and from our so-called “cultural personalities” and the associated “intellectual elite,” one could easily believe that most of them have escaped from an asylum, and very well come to doubt the raison d’être of such a people when they tacitly accept the state of affairs – lulled to sleep by “Dancing with the Stars” and “The Great Baking Show” etc. It certainly does not look good. But so what?

Understandably, some people are looking for an exit strategy in this situation. In short, they want to escape. The problem is that today there are not many places to escape to. A hundred years ago, the world was open to you. You could emigrate to the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, southern and eastern Africa, and not least to South America, where Argentina, among other places, seemed to offer unimagined opportunities. In those countries, you could safely build a new life for yourself, confident that you were still living in white, European societies. None of these countries are attractive today to people who want to escape Muhammad’s soldiers and multicultural society — quite the contrary. You would be jumping out of the frying pan into the fire. That’s how quickly things have changed. And in the future, things will change even faster. So where to go?

The easiest choice today would be Poland, where they still keep the EU at arm’s length, celebrate Catholic European civilization, fight decadence, ban infanticide, etc. Poland is a country where there are virtually no Muslims and where immigration is severely restricted. However, it does exist. The larger cities have their blacks, although they are few – for now. There were also few 50 years ago. However, foreigners must work. There is no help available if you do not want to. For obvious reasons, this significantly limits the influx. I have also witnessed a demonstration in front of a church in Warsaw, where a small, cold-stricken crowd sang hymns while worshipping the rainbow flag. There were not many of them, and there were almost as many police officers to watch over them as there were participants, but it is a clear sign that there is a worm in the apple.

Polish is also probably the most accessible of the languages that come into question if you want to flee, and the Polish way of life and culture will not seem foreign to us, on the contrary – and life in Poland is certainly good and relatively inexpensive. Most Poles are good people, and we would find it easy to live with them. As a temporary solution, you could settle in one of the German villages around Oppeln. In that area, you can get by very well with German, but there is no way around learning Polish – and no way around Catholicism if you want to be part of society. And that is what you want, isn’t it? Or do you just want to live in isolation, worshipping your own worthless little life, now detached from your roots, your history and your natural habitat?

The biggest problem with Poland is that the current government is barely hanging on by its fingernails, and that another government will quickly roll out the blessings of Western Europe to their compatriots, just as it will open the door to the EU. That is the second problem. Poles love the free movement of labor—but they do not care much for political interference in Poland’s internal affairs. The fact is, however, that today there are no national “internal affairs” within the EU. You can’t be in and out at the same time! A referendum on continued EU membership in Poland would probably result in a resounding YES – at least today. Fleeing to Poland could very easily turn out to be a very temporary escape!

Another obvious country of refuge would be Hungary. However, much of what can be said about Poland can also be said about Hungary – both in terms of advantages and disadvantages. I have seen more black people in Budapest than in Warsaw, but in Hungary, too, they have to work! Orbán, however, is much more firmly in the saddle than his Polish colleague – but he is still dependent on a volatile public opinion, and the smear campaign against him from abroad is intense. Orbán has a great love for Netanyahu and Israel – and presumably for his Jewish wife Anikó Lévai, who is not a religious Jew, however. He considers it a moral duty to ensure that Jews can live freely and practice their religion freely in Hungary, and any form of “anti-Semitism” is strictly prosecuted. He sees a partnership with the Israeli (read: Jewish) right wing as an ideological partnership. In the short term, he can probably exploit this partnership to his advantage – but experience shows that it is more difficult in the long term! Jews make up 1% of the population of Hungary. If his policies and personal circumstances can win him their support, he will be in a strong position and will have achieved what no one else on the right wing has achieved. However, experiences elsewhere are frightening. So far, however, things seem to be going well.

He has the same EU problem as the Poles, but he has more clout behind him than Morawiecski in Poland, and there are probably fewer Hungarians abroad than there are Poles – also in percentage terms. The Hungarian language is a barrier – but languages can be learned. The country is less Catholic than Poland. Here, too, one can seek refuge with the German minority in Fünfkirchen (Pécs), but without Hungarian, one will not get very far if one wants to live in the country. Life in Hungary is also good and relatively inexpensive, the wine is excellent, and the weather is better than here. In Hungary, too, however, the flight may well be temporary.

So what is left? All the former Eastern Bloc countries are, of course, better than here when it comes to immigration, but they have the same EU-obsessed prostitute politicians as in the West. Croatia has a fairly strong right wing, but it has been steadily weakened, and the current conservative-led government is a coalition government. If you like being part of a tourist attraction, the Adriatic coast is of course fantastically beautiful and appealing, but in the summer, tourists fill the narrow streets from wall to wall. Apart from that, the country does not have much to offer, but life is certainly good and cheap, and I do not recall seeing a single black person – except among the tourists. That is a good barometer. On the other hand, there are many gypsies. The Levakovic family is from Croatia. That should be enough to say. Far too many of them do their utmost to live up to their reputation. However, this population group is found everywhere in the Balkans, indeed everywhere in Eastern Europe. The country is not yet part of Schengen, but it will be. The future is uncertain. Unfortunately, the same must be said of Serbia, where people have also become eager to join the EU. However, there is a strong nationalist movement that offers some hope. If you want to join it, you’d better join the Orthodox Church. There are many beautiful places in Serbia, and life is cheap and good. But it is not the easiest country to become a part of. Historically, there is a close connection between Serbia and Russia, but the American embassy in Belgrade is ominously large.

Finally, there are Romania and Bulgaria, both outside Schengen but eager EU members. A certain backwardness protects them to some extent from immigration from the Third World. Both countries have clear advantages in terms of beauty, prices, and quality of life, but the future is uncertain. For various reasons, I do not consider the Czech Republic, Slovakia, North Macedonia, Slovenia, and Montenegro to be realistic countries of refuge—and Albania is completely out of the question. The same goes for Kosovo, Europe’s most uninteresting and disgusting country. Then, of course, there is Ukraine, which is easily accessible but a country with major problems and an uncertain future. Its biggest weakness, however, is its longing for the EU. Belarus is in the news for all the wrong reasons, and its future is uncertain.

If I had to choose an exit country, it would undoubtedly be Russia. Putin is firmly in power, and the Western-backed so-called opposition is ridiculous. This also applies to the clown Navalny, who is only taken seriously in the West. It is difficult to imagine that the government would have tried to kill him. It is more likely to be a showdown among criminals. So you can count on political stability. Life in Russia, however, takes a little more getting used to than life in Poland – but on the other hand, you are free from all the bad habits and idiocy of the West, and the population as a whole has very healthy values. Russian is an absolute necessity. However, one should not be blind to the fact that Putin is not motivated by racist motives. In his mind’s eye – like many ordinary Russians – he sees the borders of the former Soviet Union as Russia’s natural and true borders, and everyone from the former Soviet Union is welcome in Russia – as long as they work. A taxi driver in Moscow may well come from Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, or some other distant place, and Russia itself has a significant Muslim population, which is admittedly concentrated in specific areas and has learned the limits of its activities. But they are there. You also see black people on the streets of Moscow and especially in St. Petersburg, which in my opinion has a slightly too Western feel to it. There aren’t many, but… However, if you leave the two largest cities, you are in the European part and in large parts of Siberia completely among Europeans. It’s a wonderful feeling. Putin is a realist politician – this can be seen, for example, in the conflict between Christian and Indo-European Armenia and Muslim and Turkish Azerbaijan. Armenia is a small and insignificant country, Azerbaijan a nation rich in raw materials. And he probably has enough on his plate at the moment…

However, despite all the objections, Russia is the country where white people have the best chance of survival – and Russia has a lot to offer. If you want to flee, you have to do it while you are young. None of the countries mentioned are particularly elderly-friendly, and if you are elderly and do not have money from home, you should not even think about fleeing to one of them.

So is escape a possibility? No – not really. As they say in the US: “You can run but you cannot hide!” And that’s the crux of the matter, because Americans are familiar with the problem. When they are vehemently opposed to trams, light rail, and local buses, it is because these bring the problems of the inner city to the suburbs, forcing white Americans to flee. When the first black family moves in, “For Sale” signs go up on the lawns, even if it is a nice, decent family moving in. Experience has taught white Americans that others will follow who are not quite so easy to live with, and when there are too many dark faces on the streets and in shopping centers, property prices plummet, which attracts even more people. Ghettoization is underway, and those who have not been quick to act lose everything. So people move further out into the countryside until the problems reach them there too, and so on ad infinitum.

I have been able to follow this from the front row for the last 40 years, both in the Washington D.C. area, in Chicago, and in Milwaukee, where the process is now underway in the northern suburbs. Idiotic Danes can easily sit at home on their couches and be horrified by the cruel and racist Americans, but it’s not their lives and property that are being affected.

However, we are talking about a lifelong escape, and there are fewer and fewer places to flee to! Honestly: Is this how you want to live your life? Is this how you want your children to live? And wherever you may find refuge, it will not be your country. It will not be your culture, your people, or your language. Is this what remains of the Viking spirit? A people where the best stick their tails between their legs and run away instead of taking up the fight and at least going down with dignity, if nothing else?

We know that some have been forced to flee – not to seek greater comfort, but because their lives were in danger. I have great respect for that, but I have no respect for those who today talk of leaving the country because their compatriots are apparently not worthy of them. They are too valuable themselves, but if you put them under the microscope, they are usually small people who have not done anything real to turn the tide, who have not put anything at risk and have not lost anything in the cause, but who simply indulge in the sweet life as they understand it.

Admittedly, we have all too often been disappointed by our fellow human beings, and it can undeniably sometimes be difficult to maintain respect for the great mass of voting cattle who so clearly have understood nothing and who seem to have lost all connection to their people and to reality. But we need to look at why this is the case – and once we have acknowledged it, we need to truly “drain the swamp” – and do so much more thoroughly than Inger Støjberg – with all due respect – intends to do. Denmark can also survive with 2 million inhabitants – as long as they are the right 2 million. It is not the ideal scenario, but it can work, because there is no easy way out of the current situation, and anyone who thinks there is is fooling themselves. This battle must be fought in the streets, and it is gratifying to see that so many tractors and fishing boats can be gathered in the country’s two largest cities. It is only shameful that they did not bring their slurry tankers and empty their contents on the doorsteps of politicians. And it is embarrassing – but extremely characteristic – to see the Social Democrats’ new parliamentary group leader giving them the finger on Facebook. This is a battle between the productive forces in society and the parasites of the big cities, who do nothing useful and create no value. That is the class we must get rid of!

Unfortunately, this battle will not stop at tractors and manure, but when the government routinely violates the constitution – and it is not only in the case of the minks – and the head of government brazenly states that she would do it again, even though she will be violating the constitution she has signed to uphold, when the police – at all levels – led by the chief of police, enforce illegal orders, and when the government deploys the military against Danish citizens, then all that remains is rebellion. Then the rule of law is abolished! I am sorry to have to admit it, because I have naively spent my entire life trying to prove that the ship could be turned around democratically within the framework of the system, but my experience has undeniably been that the system consistently tramples on this much-vaunted democracy whenever it suits it, and now we have had this rot confirmed from the very top. The laws only have to be obeyed when it suits those in power!

What we have experienced since the spring is undeniably very reminiscent of the German “Ermächtigungsgesetz” of 1933, which suspended the constitution and handed all power to the prime minister. His name was Adolf Hitler. If that is the path we are to take, it should certainly not be with Mette Frederiksen at the helm!

And now people want to flee, only to return home if this battle is won – back to the good life in their homeland. Without having made any effort… It is this attitude that discourages me more than the middle finger of an indifferent social democrat. If this is how we want to solve the problems, we really do not deserve to survive.

Unfortunately, I am too old to play robbers and soldiers and am not trained in the art of war. Others will have to figure it out, and they will have to hurry before the war is triggered from another side. The Muslim armies are in place. However, it cannot be said often enough that Muslims are only an annoying symptom. The disease is deeply rooted in the people, and that is where it must be fought. Even if the last Muslim left tomorrow and the government dangled from lampposts, the people would be doomed if they did not change direction. This is not to say that Islam is not dangerous. It certainly is, but Islam only exists here because successive governments have allowed it in, and because the voting cattle keep voting for the very politicians who want nothing but the downfall of the people. Every now and then, one finds oneself wishing that these sheeple—and above all the ruling Islam-loving, feminist, and gender-confused elite—were allowed to experience Islamism firsthand. Pernille Skipper in a burqa and the stoning of Mette Frederiksen would certainly be aspects of Islam that one could appreciate!

However, it is this necessary change of direction that concerns me. Here, too, I need help and support, and that is not readily available. Nationalist people who may have good reasons for not joining the barricades could, however, without further ado and without risk to their bourgeois existence, buy a couple of books now and then and thereby spread them and ensure their survival – while at the same time supporting nationalist authors with a few much-needed dollars, so that they can afford the luxury of writing and publishing books for the few – because it is not free, after all. But here, too, national zeal fails. Everyone obviously knows all this already – without this apparently having any consequences.

Perhaps the “refugees” are right after all. Perhaps there is no hope at all. But I still prefer to go down fighting! Is there anyone who wants to join me?

Povl H. Riis-Knudsen

Translated with the help of AI