This article was originally published in Danish on September 12, 2020.

---

Recently, a majority of the organized criminal gang, also known as the elected representatives, who currently occupy Christiansborg, passed a completely idiotic so-called consent law, which in practice a priori makes all men rapists.

The justification for this feministic hysterical idiotic law was “the individual’s free choice and the inviolability of the body.” The politicians made a big deal out of emphasizing the sanctity and inviolability of these principles; it was not something that could be discussed—that was just the way it was!

However, shortly afterwards, a debate erupted that brilliantly, but quite unnecessarily, illustrates the boundless hypocrisy of politicians. An opinion poll showed that no less than 86% of the Danish population is in favor of a ban on the ritual mutilation of healthy baby penises. We have previously fully explained the fundamental considerations in this regard, but we have found a quote on DR’s website that simply and succinctly expresses and summarizes the crux of the matter:

“Genital slaughter”: “You are completely crazy. If you can only be a good Jew by having part of your penis slaughtered as a baby, then you are quite simply retarded. You live in a completely different world and era. You are, of course, welcome to do so, but I would suggest that you emigrate to Israel in that case. I have the same attitude toward Muslims, who, as far as I’m concerned, are welcome to slaughter each other in and on each other, as long as it takes place in Muslimistan. Your ancient relics—and this applies to both idiotic religious groups—are best served by keeping to yourselves in your respective countries. Where you are free to slaughter halal and kosher and cut up your children. It is sad that you are unable to adapt to reality. You are – along with the Muslims – a bunch of disgusting human butchers.”

With the Consent Law in mind, no one can be in any doubt that we live in a terminally ill society where black is white and white is black: thus, in 2020, you must have consent to touch a penis, but not to cut one. You have to have studied for many years at RUC to understand that logic.

For far too long, Middle Eastern populations have been allowed to cut their boys’ genitals with impunity to satisfy their imaginary, sadistic sky gods. The debate about these Semitic crimes has periodically reared its unwelcome head, but it has always been quickly shut down again. It does not seem to be a debate that our current regime and its propaganda organs are happy about.

This time, however, the genie was completely out of the bottle, and it has truly caused the masks to fall. Otherwise reasonably sensible people such as Morten Uhrskov Jensen, Aia Fog, Morten Messerschmidt, and Marie Krarup have thus made themselves thoroughly ridiculous by supporting the inviolable right of Jews, and thus also Muslims, to continue their perverse traditions in this country. In this connection, we have become aware that several people have directly asked some of the above-mentioned individuals via social media whether they also believe that certain Jews’ ritual cutting of the mutilated baby penis should also be accepted. So far, none of them have responded, but it would not surprise us if, in their chronic Judeophilia, they would wholeheartedly support the practice of this tradition in this country. It is nauseating to see how these “critics of Islam” are helping to pave the way for the consolidation of Islamic culture and further Islamization, simply to appease another Middle Eastern population group. Going forward, criticism of Muslims and Islam from this quarter will ring somewhat hollow. Can one be patriotic while at the same time supporting the Islamization of Denmark just to make the Jews happy? We would also like to remind our readers that even though Morten Uhrskov Jensen, Aia Fog, Morten Messerschmidt, and Marie Krarup are very concerned about the Jews, the Jews are most concerned about the Muslims…

However, the most interesting thing about this debate is not what some inconsistent fogheads on the so-called right wing have said without blushing, but the statements made by our “everyone’s prime minister” Mette Frederiksen in this regard. Previously, Mette Frederiksen stated that she was naturally in favor of a ban on ritual circumcision. However, in an interview in Weekendavisen, whose editor-in-chief is, as we know, Martin Krasnik, who describes himself as a “fucking Jew,” she now says that she is against a ban on ritual circumcision. Her reasoning for this U-turn is a challenge to the gag reflex of all decent people. We quote from DR:

“The question of a possible ban on the circumcision of Jewish boys cannot stand alone.

It must be seen in the light of the fate of the Jews. A fate that has been marked by persecution and suspicion. Among other things, during World War II, when six million Jews lost their lives as a result of the Nazi genocide…

Because the issue is about much more than just foreskin, says the Prime Minister.

It cannot be viewed in isolation from the history of Denmark and Europe. The history of Europe is a history of persecution of Jews. It has been so for many hundreds of years…

It culminated in the 1930s and 40s with the systematic slaughter, with genocide, with the Holocaust. Unfortunately, that is Europe’s history.

That is why she is against a ban.

For many Jews, it will not be possible to practice their faith and remain in Danish society if a ban on circumcision is implemented, she says.

You would have to search long and hard to find such idiotic nonsense! It goes without saying that what some Germans did to some Jews more than half a century ago can never justify cutting into the genitals of healthy young children today. Because the Germans killed Jews, little Jewish – and Muslim boys must pay for eternity by having a piece of their penis cut off! What have they done, Mette?

It also says:

“Personally, however, she is not in favor of circumcision, she says.

When you look at this issue completely detached from history and only look at the individual, I am not a supporter of circumcision myself. Therefore, I recognize the dilemmas. I fully understand why many Danes take the view that circumcision of minors should not take place.”

You probably have to be a chronic social democrat to understand how this all fits together. Mette Frederiksen is supported by the leader of the Liberal Party, who is also against a ban, as he likewise believes that we “owe” the Jews the freedom to continue cutting their children. Note that neither the prime minister nor the leader of the Liberal Party mentions Muslims with so much as a word, which is strange, as they are otherwise usually a protected species. In this context, they must apparently give way to others. First and foremost, the Jewish minority must thus have carte blanche to do the most sickening things and be forever above criticism. They are special, they are sacred, they are always victims, they are always innocent.

One must ask oneself why the country’s prime minister and the leader of Denmark’s largest opposition party are, in a completely undemocratic manner, going against what no less than 86% of the population thinks about this issue. These politicians are otherwise quite adept at pandering to public opinion and the cheap votes that come with it. For our thoroughly opportunistic politicians, this behavior is both atypical and self-destructive. Why are they doing this?

We have a suggestion as to the reason: two days ago, the influential American Jewish lobby organization Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith (ADL) tweeted that it was aware of the debate in Denmark and was working closely with the Danish government to find an acceptable solution. This tweet has since disappeared from the ADL’s website, but it was an interesting admission, and there is precedent for the ADL putting pressure on governments that do not dance eagerly enough to the Jewish tune. Furthermore, it should be noted that the debate in Denmark has not gone unnoticed by Israel.

All things being equal, it must be assumed that the acceptable solution is the one that Mette Frederiksen has now presented. It thus appears that a foreign lobby organization is able to dictate what Denmark’s prime minister should think, in direct contradiction to the wishes of the majority of the population and her own personal opinion! This naturally raises questions about where Denmark is actually governed from. Who has the real power in this country, and who does Mette Frederiksen actually serve? Whose prime minister is she really? We will leave it up to the informed reader to answer that question, but one thing is certain: Mette Frederiksen is not the Danes’ and certainly not “the children’s prime minister”!

Povl H. Riis-Knudsen

Translated with the help of AI