This article was originally published in Danish on March 8, 2020.
That was the headline of Kristeligt Dagblad, a Danish newspaper, in one of the countless meaningless, idiotic articles about the Jews’ so-called “holocaust” on the occasion of the 75th anniversary of the Russian occupation of Auschwitz. I don’t know how the readers feel, but I feel stuffed with nonsense on this occasion.
How many genocides, atrocities, and acts of bestiality can history show us? And we don’t even need to go back to Genghis Khan or the countless biblical massacres committed by the Jews. Recent history provides ample examples. The extermination of the American Indians, the genocide of the Armenians and the Greeks living in the Ottoman Empire, where more than 1.5 million people were slaughtered in the most brutal and disgusting manner, women were raped and crucified naked, children were chopped to pieces in front of their parents before they themselves were dispatched. Muslims should never complain about “genocide” against them. They have left a very broad trail of unspeakable atrocities throughout history and will only reap what they have sown! Better known are Stalin’s atrocities, the arbitrary shooting of dissidents by the thousands in every city, deportations to the GULAG, where prisoners were literally worked to death, and the imposed famine that claimed nearly 6 million Ukrainian and an unknown number of Russian victims. The mass murderer Stalin is responsible for 30 million victims, his colleague Lenin for another 15-17 million. When he did not reach more, it was only because he fell ill and died. Then there was the bombing of Europe and Japan, where they were not content with killing the living, but took the unborn with them – yes, those who had not even been conceived yet – the bombing of refugee convoys and the torpedoing of refugee ships, not to mention the expulsion of 12 million Germans from their homeland, resulting in at least 2 million deaths….
The list is long, and all these atrocities have in common that they are commemorated at most locally for the Armenian and Ukrainian victims. The rest are forgotten. Yes, modern national-masochistic Germany almost celebrates these mass murders of Germans. There is plenty of material for films in all these events. How must it feel for a mother to see her small children burned alive by American phosphorus bombs before she herself is melted away? What must it be like to be baked in a shelter? What must the victims of the unspeakable Soviet war crimes in eastern Germany have felt when they were raped by 100 drunken soldiers, had their breasts cut off and a bayonet firmly planted in their abdomen when the festivities were over? There is really good film material in this – material that, if properly processed, would not leave a dry eye in the cinema or at home.
However, these films have never been made. Only a blatantly miserable German series about the expulsion from Eastern Europe, where everything is reduced to the fact that it was all the fault of the “Nazis.” The film world is dominated by Jews,1 and it is largely Jews who, through their control of the media, set the agenda for what is discussed and what can be said. That is why the other films have not been made. There must be no victims to mourn other than the Jews! For all this Jewish emotional pornography has, first and foremost, a political aim. It is intended to make today’s Jews and the state of Israel immune to any criticism, because criticism of the Jews will automatically lead to a new Auschwitz, it is claimed. In the same way, Auschwitz is used as a weapon against any national and patriotic movement. It must necessarily lead to Auschwitz, it is believed. However, what will inevitably lead to a new Auschwitz is the constant undermining of Western values and Western nation states by the Jewish intellectual elite. Sooner or later, this must lead to a backlash, in which Auschwitz may well be transformed into a working museum.
No, what makes Auschwitz unique, it is claimed, is the industrial extermination of people on the basis of their religion. I don’t really know whether it is worse to use religion to select victims than to use party membership or nationality – or perhaps simply the principle of chance. After all, the Turks’ extermination of the Armenians and Greeks was also based on their religion. They are Christians. As far as industrialization is concerned, it is actually difficult to see anything particularly industrial about the holocaust. A significant proportion of the victims were simply lined up and shot – just like Roosevelt’s “Uncle Joe” in the Soviet Union. The use of gas chambers, as it is presented, is almost amateurish, fumbling, and experimental. In any case, I would much rather end my days in a gas chamber than on a cross or in a basement under burning Dresden. Honestly!
If any of my readers think I have said all this before, I can only say that repetition aids understanding. In any case, I have not repeated it as often as the history of the holocaust has been retold and creatively reworked. Now we have arrived at “The Tattooist of Auschwitz,” a novel of probably dubious quality.
But having said all that, I must conclude that none of this is “the greatest crime in world history.” The greatest crime in world history is taking place right now, before our very eyes. The extermination of Europeans and the replacement of well-ordered nation states with globalist chaos that is destroying the social and economic systems of the West, the education system, the rule of law, the security of citizens – in short, the very foundations of civilization. We are seeing with our own eyes how the world’s only true high culture has been transformed in just a few years into a multicultural experiment – how the legacy of our ancestors to our descendants is being squandered and given away to strangers, so that our children and grandchildren will no longer have a place on earth they can call their own. This is truly the greatest crime in world history!
But perhaps we need to hear so much about the “holocaust” precisely because we need to forget the world’s most pressing problem while we still have time to do something about it, if we act here and now? Forget all about the “holocaust” and join the resistance against everything and everyone who threatens your children’s future!
Povl H. Riis-Knudsen
Translated with the help of AI
Note
- See: Neal Gabler: An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood, Anchor Books 1988. And no! It is not an “anti-Semitic” book – quite the contrary! ↩︎

Det er så sandt, som det er sagt at drabet på nogle millioner jøder i anden verdenskrig ikke er “Verdenshistoriens største forbrydelse”.
For eksempel set i forhold til Djengis Khans udskejelser. Han udryddede hele nationer, især sådanne, hvor indbyggerne havde en hvid hudfarve og levede på en civiliseret måde, som for eksempel Xi Xia, “De Hvide og Ophøjedes Store Land”.
Hovedreglen var, at når en by var erobret, udvalgte mongolerne alle håndværkerne og sendte dem til Mongoliet eller andre steder, hvor der var brug for dem til at bygge belejringsmaskiner og lignende. Børnene og de unge kvinder blev taget som slaver, og resten blev slået ihjel.
Mongolerne syntes at have næret et ganske særligt had til de “hvide og ophøjede” i Xi Xia. Men i Persien i gamle dage havde de også ret hvid hud, de var jo Indoeuropæere. Derfor var erobringen af dette land også et orgie i sadistisk grusomhed.
De syntes at have næret et intenst had til hvide mennesker, som levede på en civiliseret måde, hvilket minder meget om det moderne globale had mod hvide mænd.
Og, som I skriver, er der mange andre verdenshistoriske forbrydelser og folkedrab i historien, som helt kan konkurrere med drabet på jøderne om pladsen som “Verdenshistoriens største forbrydelse”, Tyrkernes drab på armenierne og grækerne under første verdenskrig, udryddelsen af de amerikanske indianere, terrorbombningen af de tyske byer, udryddelsen og fordrivelsen af etniske tyskere i Østpreussen og Schlesien i årene efter krigen og så videre.
Men jeg synes at det er en forkert vurdering at sige at det er jødernes skyld at den vestlige civilisation i dag er under angreb og egentlig i opløsning. Alle avisredaktører og undervisere i dag, jøder eller ikke jøder, søger at finde noget, som der salg i, noget som kan gøre dem populære uden særlige hensyn til deres egen nations fremtidige eksistens. De udnytter de naturlige opløsningstendenser i vores civilisation, som altid har været der, men nu har frit spil, nemlig oprøret mod fædrene og kvinders higen efter at udfordre mænds følelser.
Og følgen af en forkert vurdering er jo at man giver sig selv skyklapper på og kommer til at ignorere de virkelige dybere årsager.
Ikke at jeg derved vil underkende at det er problem for en nation at have kompakt etnisk og kulturelt fremmedlegeme i sin midte.
Som Buchanan skriver: Første Verdenskrig var den politiske katastrofe, som rystede vestlige mænds tillid til deres egen civilisation. Den skabte marxismen, anarkismen, syndikalismen, anti-kolonialismen med videre.
https://www.dandebat.dk/dan18.htm
https://dandebat.dk/100-argument-indvandring-012.htm
LikeLike