This article was originally published in Danish on April 23, 2018.
A citizen’s proposal will, in all likelihood, finally force politicians in Christiansborg to take a stand against a perverse and bestial form of child abuse whose only justification is based on primitive religious superstition. This is circumcision, where the genitals of young boys are cut to please a non-existent deity – or in the case of the Jews as a sign of their superiority over other peoples – an identity marker, similar to the Jewish star, but completely harmless. The fact that it is the genitals – and not, for example, the earlobe – that are targeted speaks volumes about the perversity that prevails in these cultures with their primitive fixation on sexual life. It is also absurd from a theological point of view. Surely God has created man as he thinks he should be. What right do humans have to think they can improve this creation? More soberly, the human body is a result of evolution – the foreskin has a purpose. It has had an evolutionary advantage – otherwise it wouldn’t have been there.
The fact that this genital mutilation is being discussed at all is a scandal – and the discussion is completely unnecessary. Section 67 of the Constitution provides the framework for freedom of religion: Citizens have the right to unite in communities to worship God in a manner consistent with their convictions, provided that nothing is taught or done that is contrary to morality or public order.
Cutting children’s genitals for ritual reasons is against both morality and public order, according to the Penal Code, which states:
§ 244. Whoever commits violence against or otherwise assaults the body of another shall be punished by a fine or imprisonment of up to 3 years.
§ 245. Anyone who commits an assault of a particularly crude, brutal or dangerous nature or is guilty of ill-treatment shall be punished by imprisonment of up to 6 years. If such assault has resulted in significant injury to body or health, this shall be regarded as a particularly aggravating circumstance.
Subsection 2. Anyone who, outside the cases mentioned in subsection (1), inflicts bodily harm or injury to health on another person shall be punished by imprisonment of up to 6 years.
According to these clauses, parents who find it necessary to spank their children while raising them – something that does them absolutely no harm, on the contrary – are punished, but not those parents, rabbis and imams who abuse young children without anesthesia by removing a piece of their penis, thus making them sexual invalids for the rest of their lives. This must stop – without further discussion. There is no need for a special law on this matter, it is only a question of applying the law that already exists.
Furthermore, by acceding to the International Convention on the Rights of the Child, Denmark has committed itself to stopping this religious madness, but strangely enough, this provision is not being followed. However, the conventions must always be slavishly complied with when it comes to provisions to the detriment of the Danish people.
Circumcision is practiced by Jews and Muslims. If only Muslims had practiced this primitive and barbaric Middle Eastern rite, the discussion would have been over long ago and circumcision banned. Circumcision of girls – which Jews do not perform – was banned outright, even though it is as much a part of the religious ritual of primitive peoples in Africa as the circumcision of boys by Jews. But now, 15 Jewish boys are circumcised every year, and all hell breaks loose, and the Jews even threaten to leave Denmark – which could only be considered an added bonus.
Jews – and Muslims – simply have to get into the 21st century. What adults do to themselves in the name of religion is largely their own business, but not what they do to others and certainly not to children. Why should male circumcision be protected under the cloak of religion, but not female circumcision? In a globalized world, we must also expect other barbaric practices to find their way to Europe. Where is the limit to what you can do if you call it a religious commandment? What about human sacrifice, witch burnings, stonings and all the rituals of manhood performed in the name of religion?
It is shameful to watch the politicians squirm in this matter. The total lack of backbone of this characterless mob makes their exercises completely acrobatic. You can clearly see the puppets of the Jewish master race at work – and especially on the right wing, where it is even a duty to lick the anus of this master race. Letter writers who allow themselves to be against circumcision are routinely kicked out by both the Danish People’s Party and New Right, which clearly show whose interests they represent. It is not the interests of the Danish people!
By invoking the Holocaust in every other sentence, should a small, loud, overbearing minority once again succeed in stifling voices defending the right of young children not to be mutilated and, in many cases, suffer lasting psychological trauma? Yes, we can consider that for sure. This small minority has a disproportionate influence on the economy as well as the media and owns the politicians lock, stock and barrel. The outcome of the discussion is a foregone conclusion. Circumcision will not be banned, but at most it will eventually be transferred to the hospitals, which one would think have more serious tasks to take care of, not to mention the bill, which will also be passed on to Danish taxpayers. Just wait and see!
If you want to stop the circumcision of male children, it will require some of the victims to take legal action against their parents, the rabbi or imam and against the Danish state for not protecting them according to the law. We would be happy to support such a case, but of course the outcome is not a foregone conclusion here either. The minority is certainly not without influence in the legal world, but the law has many considerations to take into account – among other things, because court decisions set precedents. In any case, the case would be extremely interesting.
What we are witnessing is a manifestation of the blessings of immigration and multiculturalism. What does this discussion have to do with the Danish media and the Danish public? These are customs that belong to another part of the world and which they should be allowed to keep to themselves in their own homes – but not here! These foreign peoples must therefore leave! It is thought-provoking that Jews are always at the forefront when it comes to promoting immigration and thus the destruction of the Danish people. “We have everything in common with Muslims!” Bent Melchior says in an interview. It is thought-provoking that the Danish taxpayer has to pay untold amounts to try to protect Jewish institutions against Muslims. And if there had been no Muslims, the circumcision of 15 poor little Jews a year could have continued without any public interest whatsoever – but now we’re talking about thousands of victims, and the situation is different. The Jews are reaping what they have sown.
Of course, a more radical view would be that Jews and Muslims should be allowed to cut each other as much as they want – it’s simply none of our business as long as they don’t cut us, but if we want to maintain the rule of law in its current form, this is not a sustainable way to go.
As for the male politicians, we would like to suggest a thorough circumcision according to orthodox Jewish ritual so they know what they are talking about! And the women should be forced to watch!
Update, 2024
The petition succeeded in gathering the necessary signatures and the bill was sent to a vote in the Danish parliament, where it was clearly voted down even though 80% of the voters agreed with a ban (!)
Povl H. Riis-Knudsen
Translated by means of AI
Danmarks Frihedsraad 