This article was originally published in Danish on January 21, 2018.

---

New times, new customs

Britain’s Prince Harry and his new multiracial fiancée traveled to Nice on a scheduled flight in monkey class. Shame on anyone who thinks ill of it! How are the mighty fallen!

Apropos

Hennes and Mauritz recently launched a new piece of children’s clothing with the text “Coolest monkey in the jungle”. Now, of course, you might wonder why anything should be written on clothing at all – and why it should be in English, but that’s not what caused the problem. Since they stopped using only native white models a long time ago, they put a little “Swedish” negro boy in this shirt. Outrageous! But honestly: What a racist reaction! Who saw anything other than a little boy in that shirt? As we all know, races don’t exist in Alice’s politically correct wonderland. And would it have been okay if the model had been white or yellow? Apparently, some people have a well-developed inferiority complex. God knows where it comes from? But you have to wonder how someone at H&M could have come up with that! They must have been living on the moon for years. It was an expensive prank. All the clothes are destroyed, because imagine if someone could put them on! Shops were looted and burned down by Negroes who felt insulted, but whose behavior only confirmed the worst prejudices. But there was nothing “cool” about it!

Apropos 2

Henry Bolton was briefly the leader of the ailing United Kingdom Independence Party (Ukip). He paired up with a young model called Jo Marney. She has written to her former fiancé – not publicly – that she finds the aforementioned Prince Harry’s fiancé ugly, and that she thinks black people are ugly in general. And then she also called Meghan a “stupid little petit bourgeois” whose genes would “disgrace the royal family”. She has nothing against other races (who does?), but she wants to live in Britain and not in Africa. That could lead to a black prime minister or a black king. In other words, a perfectly sensible white girl, and there should be more of them. Well, white people generally think black people are ugly – Well, white people generally think black people are ugly – they just don’t want to admit it openly anymore. Chinese people think we are terribly ugly with our long noses. Blacks actually think we’re ugly too, but there’s prestige in having a white wife (or a white husband for that matter). The aesthetic sense is largely racial, but this divide can of course be artificially broken down, and it will be! However, it is natural to think this way. In any case, whether you find this or that ugly is a private matter. Some like redheads, some don’t, some like chubby girls, others skinny girls. Whether you think Harry’s Meghan is ugly is really a matter of taste. She’s a lot prettier than Obama – but hey, that’s for Jo Marney to decide. However, it’s a bad idea to have your ex as a confidant, which is an old lesson, because he leaked the private messages to the press, Henry Bolton dumped Jo, Jo duly apologized and was kicked out of Ukip, and there are calls for Henry Bolton to step down as party leader (he’s the 4th in a year). All because Jo Marney privately thinks black people are ugly and Meghan is a “stupid little petit bourgeois” and that she prefers Britain to Africa (aptly characterized by Trump as “a shithole”, but you can’t say that either). You really have to wonder if we live in a madhouse, but blacks are a totally protected species about whom you can only think positive things. As for Ukip, it’s fair to say that there are probably much more serious things to worry about – especially for a party in free fall. But of course, one of the leadership candidates in the last leadership election was black, so what can you expect? This is not the party to secure Britain’s future!

Apropos 3

At London Zoo, a small okapi deer was given a name, Meghan, after the aforementioned future princess. It’s a good thing it wasn’t this cute little guy who needed a name!

Fake news

French presidential wunderkind Emanuel Macron, who was pulled out of the hat by moneyed circles who feared Marine le Pen would become president, has announced a crackdown on “fake news”. The problem is to determine which news is really fake. It will be a huge and insurmountable task for the courts, and if successful, it will mean that French newspapers will become very thin, not even the ads will remain, only the date. The EU is obviously excited about the idea and wants to copy it. It’s time to get rid of dissenters who think differently from the EU’s out of touch ‘elite’. It must all be fake news.

Der freiste Staat auf deutschem Boden

France has always been ahead of the curve when it comes to the suppression of freedom of expression. Voltaire has truly lived in vain! But in this, as in so many other areas, they have always been beaten by Germany. After all, the Germans are the best – also at silencing dissidents. No other so-called civilized country has so many banned books and so many political prisoners. But apparently, imagination knows no bounds. To combat the internet freedom that Germans have always dreamed of controlling, draconian fines have been imposed on social media and other internet service providers for publishing offensive or ‘racist’ content. Who is to decide what is offensive and ‘racist’? Well, in a rule of law, the courts should do it, but the concept of the rule of law itself is completely unknown in Germany. Roland Freisler, unlike Voltaire, has not lived in vain! In practice, it is left to the various Internet service providers, because if they await a court decision, they will be punished and who wants to be fined up to 50 million euros? Not Zuckerberg & Co! So they carry out strict censorship on behalf of the state against anything that deviates even slightly from the politically correct average. Then you’re on the safe side. No stone unturned there! With such a system, who needs state censorship? Privatization of the courts – completely in keeping with the times. Maybe also something for Løkke Rasmussen and his cronies, who will soon run out of things to privatize. But perhaps it could be turned into an advantage, considering the courts we have!

Ghetto

As usual, the Prime Minister promises to do something about the ghettos in his New Year’s speech from the bottom of the latrine. The houses must be demolished. They tried that a long time ago in Gellerup. You just move the problems and spread them to even more areas. It’s not the houses that are the problem. They are excellent – or at least they were before they let the third world into them. It’s the residents that are the problem! They are the ones that need to be removed. But not surprisingly, this is beyond Løkke Rasmussen’s modest comprehension. Evil tongues claim that the cerebellum spends all its time looking for the cerebrum.

Don’t say we can’t learn anything from abroad!

In Iran, they have decided to ban English in the lower grades of school. It interferes with the learning of the students’ mother tongue, and as a medium, English provides access to nothing but dirt and trivialities anyway. We couldn’t agree more! Let’s copy this initiative immediately!

The Holy Spirit is sought in millions of paternity cases

In his Christmas sermon, the dreadful Pope compared the current flood of so-called refugees, who are in fact the worst part of the African continent’s unimpressive population, to the Holy Family. So now we know where the overpopulation in the 3rd world comes from – the Holy Spirit has been at work again!

Church of Denmark

We are not unaccustomed to the fact that some parishes feel compelled to emphasize that they are looking for a believing pastor. Of course, this shouldn’t be necessary, but it is. Religious priests seem to be a minority. What is new is that a parish has sought a non-believing priest, namely a priest who wants to marry homosexuals, thereby ignoring several biblical passages and denying God’s wisdom as expressed in the creation of man and woman.(1) Homosexuality is simply contrary to the basis of the national church. Of course, the state may decide that it is fine, but it is an undue presumption for an Indian Church Minister, for whom Christianity is very nebulous, to introduce rituals into the Church that are contrary to its foundation. It is no excuse that the people of the Church themselves participated in this desecration of faith. A clergyman – be it bishop or priest – who violates the faith is not doing God’s work, but Satan’s – at the expense of the Danish taxpayer and in the name of the national church. Mene, mene, tekel, ufarsin! (Daniel 5:25)

(1) See e.g. Leviticus 3. Leviticus, ch. 18.22 “You shall not lie with a man as you lie with a woman; it is an abomination” and ch. 20.13 “If anyone lies with a man as you lie with a woman, they have both committed an abomination; they shall be put to death, the guilt of blood shall be upon them.” And it continues in the same way in the New Testament, for example in Romans chapter 1, 1 Corinthians chapter 6 and in 1 Timothy chapter 1. When Minister of Justice Søren Pape Poulsen characterizes himself as a Christian with sound conservative values, it’s hard to know whether to laugh or cry.

Indonesia as a model

Lars Løkke Rasmussen, by the grace of God and the boundless stupidity of the electorate, Prime Minister of Denmark, was on a state visit to Indonesia some time ago – a country he probably knew nothing about, but who wonders? Thus, he felt called to praise Indonesia as a model of religious tolerance that we should learn from. Indonesia’s overwhelming majority are Muslims (87%) and a growing proportion of them are embracing the most radical forms of Islam which, supported financially by the Gulf States, is spreading like a plague throughout Southeast Asia. In Indonesia, Christians who try to participate in political life are being hunted down. For example, Basuki Tjahaja Purnama, the governor of the capital Jakarta, was sentenced to two years in prison for insulting Islam because he claimed that the Koran could not be used as a warning against voting for non-Muslims. And he is far from the only one. Hundreds of Sharia-inspired laws have also recently been passed in parliament. It’s not far from public flogging (perhaps something we could learn from), severed hands (a bad idea) and stonings (too inconvenient). So much for Indonesia’s tolerance! Even in Bali, still a pleasant Hindu haven in the midst of the Islamic muck, the majority population is under pressure from Muslims. The village idiot from Græsted simply doesn’t get it: Islam tolerates no competition. There is no room for other faiths. This is true in Indonesia, just as it is in Denmark! It’s the nature of every religion – including Christianity! Two religions cannot live side by side. They each represent different value systems that are claimed to be God-given and therefore indisputable. If you don’t notice it in the Danish National Church, it’s because it’s no longer Christian! But of course, no one – not even the Prime Minister – is obligated beyond their abilities. This sets certain narrow limits.

Dane of the Year

Not unexpectedly, the Dane of the Year is not Danish. One of the characteristics of totalitarian regimes is that words mean something other than what they actually mean. It’s Newspeak as described by George Orwell. The Dane of the Year is an Afghan named Nadia Nadim, whose great, unimportant merit is that she plays soccer – something girls shouldn’t even bother with. But thanks to Nadia, there’s been a lot of focus on this sport that otherwise never garnered any interest. But now it could be used for something political! It is of course part of the story that Nadia does not play for a Danish team, but for an English team, from which she is loaned out for Danish international matches because she happens to have a Danish passport. Nadia has also been named Opinion Maker of the Year by Politiken, (1) but Nadia has not formed any opinion, she just parrots Politiken’s opinion. She defines Danishness as humanity, solidarity and tolerance. Nadia thinks these are disappearing. Of course, this is a poor definition of Danishness, but let’s leave it at that. In today’s politically correct Europe, you could probably get all people to define themselves this way. The thing is, however, that these concepts make no sense outside a defined community. It is these characteristics, among others, that have created the welfare society we had until the invasion from the third world destroyed it. It was created by a couple of generations of Danes who have done without and put their money into the community’s coffers for the benefit of the community’s people. Nadia Nadim is not part of this community, she has put nothing in the box, only taken. And when this community has given her an education and made her something, she goes to England with her talents, and I wonder if she pays taxes to Denmark in return for everything she has received. Her own people have done nothing for her because they lack the ability and will to build an organized state structure, nor does she herself demonstrate any great insight into what it takes to create a civilized society. We send our boys and, by God, our girls to Afghanistan to build a state for them. Some come home in coffins or as cripples. Meanwhile, Nadia plays soccer here and in England.

(1) A leading left-wing newspaper that, unfortunately for the Danish people, receives millions (17.5m. DKK in 2023) in state subsidies

Povl H. Riis-Knudsen

Translated by means of AI