This article was originally published in Danish on July 31, 2020.

---

By Dr. Christian Lindtner

It has become fashionable to combat racism, i.e., the distinction between races, not (yet) horse and dog races and other races, but simply human races. Many geneticists insist that such distinctions between white, yellow, and black are merely “social constructs,” i.e., nonsense. They are deceiving us! The obsession with equality confuses, but does not eliminate, natural differences.

To eradicate well-founded “racism,” one must first eradicate the races themselves. Do they know what they are doing? What do you think of a painter for whom the three (or all) colors are the same! Part of this absurd picture is the fight against gender differences, not to mention something that is rarely discussed, differences between natural caste or class formations. What is the point of creating this confusion? Experience based on observation of nature, together with general cultural history, speaks a clear language about fundamental differences between races, genders, social classes, and individuals.

Fighting these differences is like fighting or denying the difference between sun and rain, dark and light, night and day. Denying the contradiction is madness. Those who do so are sailing under false colors or have themselves fallen prey to their own crazy constructs. All talk of reducing natural differences and scientific distinctions to social constructs must be expressed as escapism, which may be based on a kind of egalitarianism or mass hysteria, often due to pressure from the group to which one believes one belongs.

It is both sad and ridiculous to see how both biologists and theologians disregard fundamental natural differences. Let animals and humans be earth and water and air or fire and heat. But also more than that. Our time is one of the most culture- and identity-poor. Better times could speak of spiritual sciences, but they are now reduced to spiritless information and communication. Genetics has nothing to say about spirit, or higher culture and education.

Even linguists are getting carried away with purging the language of the terrible, offensive word “race,” so one hardly dares to ask what purists think about a matter that was once considered so important that it appeared on postage stamps: racial purity. As everyone knows, and perhaps fewer care about, the mass media, especially in the West, revel in praising mixtures of the purer human races. The propagandists of social constructs would very much like to see early ideals of racial purity criminalized and replaced by racial mixing and the social and general confusion that experience shows will follow.

Reducing natural differences to social constructs is to make unequal things equal, to abolish the difference between true and false. Reductionists are deceivers, and their motives are rarely pure. We know this from religious swindlers who sell a salvation they cannot deliver. And now, apparently, from natural science enthusiasts as well. Ultimately, social constructivism is also a battle against the formation and unity of the family. Destroying the family is a very effective way to undermine a harmonious society. It is therefore created and functions as a weapon in a battle against an old culture, especially the European or “white” culture.

The chaotic equality hysteria is therefore a virus directed at perfectly normal fellow human beings.

***

For those who want an accessible introduction to modern race research, we highly recommend “Race, Evolution, and Behavior” by Professor J. Philippe Rushton.